In PIL No. 140 of 2012, the Court disposed of the petition without entertaining it, observing that the substantive prayers no longer survive.
Petition disposed of without entertaining the substantive prayers as they no longer survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-140.12.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.140 OF 2012
Shri. Prakash Sukhdev Bhoir and Anr. … Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Ms. Savina Bangera for the Petitioners.
Mr. A.B. Vagyani, G.P. a/w Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. P.P. Chavan I/by Ms. Reshmarani J. Nathani for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 25th JUNE 2018
P.C.
1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that with the passage of time, both the substantive prayers made in the Public Interest Litigation do not survive. In view of this statement, it is not necessary to entertain this Public Interest Litigation and the same is disposed of.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 of 1
Shri. Prakash Sukhdev Bhoir and Anr.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
A.S. OKA
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
