Allowed

Maharashtra Apang Kamgar Kalyankari Sangh Thourgh District Vice President v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC19 Nov 2018PIL/131/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought withdrawal of the public interest litigation filed to challenge an order dated 26th July 2018, availing an alternative remedy. The court allowed the withdrawal and treated the petition as disposed with liberty as prayed.

What did the court decide?

The public interest litigation was treated as disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

Maharashtra Apang Kamgar Kalyankari Sangh… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

131.18pil

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.131 OF 2018

¶5

Maharashtra Apang Kamgar Kalyankari
Sangh, Swami Vivekanand Chowk,
Shirur Tajband, Tal. Ahmedpur,
District Latur,
Through its District Vice President,
Shri. Allauddin Mainoddin Shaikh,
(Kiniwale), Age: 34 years,
Occ: Social Worker, R/o. Shirur
Tajband, Tal. Ahmedpur, Dist.Latur...PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

1. The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Public Health Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 32.

¶8

2. Competent Authority and Commissioner Disabled Welfare Maharashtra State, Pune.

¶9

3. The Director (Health Service)) Mumbai. ..RESPONDENTS

¶10

Mr M.S. Karad, Advocate h/f Mr Shrikrishna B.
Solanke, Advocate for petitioner;
Mr S.Y. Mahajan, A.G.P. for respondent/State

¶11

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE
 AND
 MANGESH S. PATIL,JJ.

¶12

 DATE : 19th NOVEMBER, 2018

¶13

131.18pil (2)

¶14

ORAL ORDER :

¶15

Learned Counsel appearing for the

¶16

petitioner, on instructions, prays for withdrawal
of this public interest litigation to challenge the
order dated 26th July, 2018 passed by the competent
authority by availing other remedy available to the
petitioner if so advised.

¶17

2.The public interest litigation is to be
treated as disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty
as prayed for.

¶18

( MANGESH S. PATIL )(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGE JUDGE

¶19

Tupe

Maharashtra Apang Kamgar Kalyankari Sangh Thourgh District Vice President v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra Apang Kamgar Kalyankari Sangh Thourgh District Vice President v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Navi Mumbai Environment Preservation Society and Anr. Vs Ministry of Environment, through Secretary, Dept of Environment and Ors.

Vinod Subhash Thorat and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra, the Addl. Chief Secretary and Ors.

Valmik Pandharinath Wakchaure and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dilip Baban Kate Vs the Union of India, the Ministry of Defence and Ors.

Perumal Chinna Thambi Vs the State of Maharashtra and 9 Ors.

Govind Gulab Deokate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Madhukar Muralidhar Nazare Vs State of Maharashtra through Gp and Anr.

Shri. Sachin Tanaji Jadhav Vs M/S. P.S.K. Infrastructure and Projects Ltd. and Ors.

Vyankatesh Khadi Kendra through Proprietor P B Phad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Daulabi Babamiya Shaikh Vs Zilla Parishad Beed through Chief Executive Officer and Others

Suhas Petroleum through Its Proprietor Sheela Maruti Manwar Vs the Union of India and Others

Rahul Bajirao Chaudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others