4 During the course of the hearing of the above Writ Petition from time to time, the issue as regards the structural stability of the building wherein the transit accommodation has been provided to the Petitioners was the issue which was raised by the learned counsel for the Petitioners. We had accordingly directed the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to carry out a survey and submit a report to us. It is required to be noted that the Respondent No.5 Developer carried out the repair work under the supervision of a licensed surveyor and has also obtained a structural stability certificate from a structural engineer which was annexed to one of its affidavits filed in the above Writ Petition. Though the exercise of carrying out survey and reporting to this Court as regards structural stability of the building wherein the transit accommodation has been provided was carried out by the MCGM, through its Assistant Engineer, we were not satisfied the manner in which the said exercise was carried out. We therefore directed the MCGM to carry out the exercise de-novo. The said de-novo exercise has now been carried out and the Executive Engineer, Building Proposal, City-II Shri Narendra Pagare who has submitted a report under his signature which is dated 31/10/2018. In the said report on the first page the works carried out by the Respondent No.5 and the observations of the Engineer of the MCGM have been listed from Item Nos.1 to 13. The report thereafter concludes thus :-
