The Bombay High Court allowed a notice of motion in an appeal after condoning a delay of 19 days on the finding that the circumstances were properly explained.
Notice of motion allowed; delay of 19 days condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.113.18 nmal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 113 OF 2018 IN
APPEAL (L) NO. 463 OF 2017
Kamalesh K. Sahani
Vs.
Ransh K. Shah
…. Respondent
Mr. Suyash Gadre i/b Utangale & Co. for the appellant Mr. Kalpesh Nanse for the respondent
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2018.
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Considering the facts
and reasons set out in the affidavit in support of notice of motion, we find that the delay is properly explained. The delay of 19 days is condoned.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.]
1 of 1
ism
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 19 days in filing the notice of motion is condonable.
Kamalesh K. Sahani
Ransh K. Shah
Nareesh H. Patil
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
