The High Court of Bombay allowed the motion to condone the delay in lodging an appeal in a company petition on winding up proceedings, set out in the supporting affidavit.
condonation of delay in lodging appeal; notice of motion allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nm669.appeal309.18.doc
1/1
RNG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION (Lodging) N0.669 of 2018
in
APPEAL (Lodging) No.309 of 2018 in
COMPANY PETITION ON.434 OF 2018
Auram Machines (I) Pvt Ltd …. … Applicant vs M/s Liang Lih Machine Co Ltd..... … Respondent and The Official Liquidator … Respondent High Court, Bombay
Ms.Priya Rambade with Mr.Aniket Worlikar I/b M/s.Deven Dwarkadas & Partners for Appellant. Mr.Ankur Shah I.b. Mr.Hemant Sethi for Respondent
CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ
DATED : 18TH JULY 2018
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
For reasons as set out in the affidavit in support of the notice
of motion, we condone the delay in filing the appeal. The motion is accordingly allowed in above terms. No costs.
{G.S.KULKARNI, J}
(NARESH H.PATIL, J}
Auram Machines (I) Pvt Ltd
M/s Liang Lih Machine Co Ltd
The Official Liquidator
NARESH H.PATIL
G.S.KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
