The appeal was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the appellants. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and disposed of the ancillary Notices of Motion as they no longer survive.
Leave to withdraw the appeal was granted; the appeal and dependent Notices of Motion were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
10-nmal 567-18 in appl 226-18
psv
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L.) NO.226 OF 2018 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1006 OF 2016 IN O.S. SUIT NO.875 OF 2011 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L.) NO.567 OF 2018 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L.) NO.472 OF 2018
Mukund Raghunath Farle & Ors.
...Appellants
Vs.
Atul Projects India Limited & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr.Ahmad Abdi with Mr.Vishal Kasbekar i/b. Motwani P. Madhavdas for Appellants.
Mr.Roop Manohar Vasudeo with Ms.Dipali Mainkar for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 2nd JULY 2018
P.C.:
The learned Counsel Mr.Ahmad Abdi appearing for the appellants seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
and Notice of Motion (L.) No.472 of 2018 do not survive. The Notice of Motion (L.) No.567 of 2018 and Notice of Motion (L.) No.472 of 2018 are accordingly disposed of.
[G.S. KULKARNI, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.]
Mukund Raghunath Farle & Ors.
Atul Projects India Limited & Ors.
Nadesh H. Patil
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
