The Commissioner of Cgst and Cx,Thane Commissionerate v. Voltas Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
384-18-NMA-2=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
384-18-NMA-2=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 384 OF 2018 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1443 OF 2017 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 378 OF 2014
The Commissioner of CGTST & CE .. Applicant
In the matter between The Commissioner of CGTST & CE .. Appellant
v/s. Voltas Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr. Swapnil Bangur a/w Mr. Joel Carlos for the applicant / orig. appellant
None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.
DATED : 4th OCTOBER, 2018.
P.C.
on instructions, seeks to withdraw this motion.
September, 2017 dismissing the petitioner's appeal for non removal of office objections. However, in view of the instructions / circular dated
11th July, 2018 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs Digitally signed by Uday Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date: Shivaji 2018.10.05 17:48:17 Jagtap +0530
1 of 2
384-18-NMA-2=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
directs the Revenue not to file fresh appeals and also withdraw the pending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
The Commissioner of CGTST & CE
Voltas Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court