Essel Propack Ltd. v. Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order addressed condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The High Court allowed condonation of approximately 538 days delay upon imposition of costs of Rs. 25,000 on the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Delay condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 25,000 to the other side.
What the court decided
902.nma 1922.17.correct doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1922 OF 2017 IN APPEAL (L) NO. 403 OF 2017 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 370 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 272 OF 2010
Essel Propack Ltd .. Applicant In the matter between Essel Propack Ltd. .. Appellant Vs. Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and anr. .. Respondents
Dr.Sheetal Vohra i/b Mr.Amol A. Deshpande, for Applicant. Mr.Hiren Kamod a/w Ms.Rinku Gajria, Ms.Raina Gajria i/b Gajria & Co., for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & G.S.KULKARNI JJ. DATE : 20th JUNE 2018
P.C. :
. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
- The Notice of Motion is taken out for condonation of
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 538 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Whether costs should be imposed on the applicant if the delay is condoned.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Essel Propack Ltd.
- respondent
Essel Kitchenware Ltd.
Coram
NARESH H.PATIL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court