The Bombay High Court condoned the delay in filing the Notice of Motion, directed payment of costs to the respondent, and disposed of the notice by order.
Condonation of delay and disposal of the Notice of Motion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 169 OF 2018 IN APPEAL (L) NO. 456 OF 2017 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2134 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO. 1680 OF 2011
Abdul Razak Sattar Chunawala and ors. .. Applicants In the matter between Abdul Razak Sattar Chunawala and ors. .. Appellants Vs. Rockline Developers Private Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Niranjan Deshpande i/b Mr.Yatin Rasiklal Shah, for the Applicant. Mr.Faran Khan i/b Mr.Tejas D.Shah, for Respondent.
CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL &
G.S.KULKARNI JJ. DATE : 22nd JUNE 2018
P.C. :
. Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in affidavit in support of
1/2
Notice of Motion and submissions advanced, we condone the delay subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be paid to the respondent within one week.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (NARESH H.PATIL, J.)
2/2
Abdul Razak Sattar Chunawala and ors.
Rockline Developers Private Ltd.
NARESH H.PATIL
G.S.KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
