Allowed

Farrokh Vafadar Irani Parsi v. Amy Kaikhushroo Toorkey (Deceased)

Bombay HC4 Dec 2018MPT/138/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a miscellaneous petition to discharge the petitioner as executor of a will without passing accounts based on the unopposed consent of the sole beneficiary, Meher Toorkey. Consequently, the beneficiary was appointed to act as executrix.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner discharged as executor without passing accounts; beneficiary Meher Toorkey appointed as executrix.

Farrokh Vafadar Irani Parsi Vs Amy Kaikhushroo… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

11-mpt138-18.doc

¶2

vai

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.138 OF 2018 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.11 OF 2015

Amy K. Toorkey

...Deceased

Farrokh V. Irani

...Petitioner

Mr.Sayeed Mulani I/b Mulani & Co. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.

¶10

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 4TH DECEMBER, 2018.

¶11

P.C. :-

¶12

Mr.Mulani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner invited my attention to the affidavit dated 26^th September, 2018 filed by Meher Toorkey, who is the sole beneficiary under the Will. In the said affidavit, she has given her free and full consent for discharging the petitioner as the executor without passing any accounts. She has also waived service of notice of the proceedings upon her.

¶13

Learned counsel also tendered the correspondence exchanged between the learned advocate on record and the said beneficiary. The said Meher Toorkey has acknowledged the receipt of Miscellaneous Petition No.138 of 2018. In the said email she has confirmed that she has already filed an affidavit giving her no

¶14

1/2

¶15

11-mpt138-18.doc

¶16

objection / consent in writing to allow the application for discharge of the petitioner herein. She has also agreed to act as an executrix for the purpose of implementing the grant of probate of the Will of her mother dated 13^th February, 2009. Copies of both the email are taken on record.

¶17

The Miscellaneous Petition No.138 of 2018 is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). There shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

The petitioner is discharged to act as the executor without passing any account. The beneficiary Meher Toorkey is allowed to act as the executrix under the said Will dated 13^th February, 2009 and under the order dated 28^th October, 2015. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶19

All the parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶20

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)

¶21

2/2

Farrokh Vafadar Irani Parsi v. Amy Kaikhushroo Toorkey (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Farrokh Vafadar Irani Parsi v. Amy Kaikhushroo Toorkey (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balkrishna Waman Zambre Vs Siddheshwar Shikshan Sanstha and Anr.

Balkrishna Waman Zambre Vs Siddheshwar Shikshan Sanstha and Anr.

Jayant Vitamins Ltd. Vs Bank of Baroda and 9 Ors.

Subhashchandra Harjivandas Kantharia Vs Harjivandas Hiralal Kantharia (Deceased)

Rugmani Radhakrishnan Nair Vs Radhakrishnan Nair (Deceased)

Nagin Chagan Patel Vs Bima Chagan Bharwad and 3 Ors.