Allowed amendment to a review application by adding grounds based on newly discovered documents. Directed amendment to be carried out within one week. No hearing followed.
Application allowed for amendment; necessary amendment to be carried out within one week in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 455 OF 2018 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 20 OF 2017
VASANT VITAL BHONSLE (DEC) AND ANR.,
... Applicants
Versus
NARENDRA PANDURANG CHATIM AND 3 ORS.,
... Respondents
Adv. Pereira Suzette Savia. A for the Applicants.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:19th July 2018
P.C.:
This is an application for amendment of the application for review by addition of certain grounds based on the documents annexed thereto which according to the applicant have been discovered by the applicant subsequent to the passing of the common judgment in the three second appeals. The record shows that there is no notice issued as yet in the review application.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
2 MCA/455/2018
ap/-
Vasant Vital Bhonsle (Dec) And Anr.
Narendra Pandurang Chatim And 3 Ors.
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
