Allowed

The State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary Women and Child Development Dept. Mumbai and Other v. Lokkalyan Bahuudeshiya Shikshan Sanstan, Thr. Secretary, Mr. Purshotam Jagannath Choudhary and 1

Bombay HC13 Apr 2018MCA/397/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the review application by the State of Maharashtra. The order recalling the direction for fund release was granted due to non-disclosure of a subsequent staying order by the Divisional Commissioner. The underlying writ petition was remitted for admission and hearing.

What did the court decide?

Review application allowed; order recalling the direction for fund release; writ petition listed for admission and hearing.

The State of Maharashtra Thr Principal… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

MCA397-18

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

M.C.A. NO.397/2018 IN W.P. NO. 1816/2017

¶5

(THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS VERSUS LOKKALYAN BAHUUDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, CHANDRAPUR & ANOTHER)

¶6

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

- - - - Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for the applicants. Shri N.S. Autkar, counsel for the non-applicants.

¶9

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND

¶10

A.D. UPADHYE, JJ.

¶11

DATE : APRIL 13, 2018.

¶12

By this review application, the State Government seeks a review of the order dated 07.02.2018 directing the applicants to release the amount of Rs.24,94,259/- in favour of the applicantpetitioner-Sanstha.

¶13

Shri Fulzele, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the applicant-State, points out that the modified order of the Divisional Commissioner, Woman and Child Development, Nagpur, dated 16.10.2017 staying all the orders passed in pursuance of the government resolution was not brought to the notice of this Court. It is stated that the order dated 07.10.2017 on the basis of which this Court had directed the release of the amount in favour of the petitioners was stayed by the order dated 16.10.2017 that was not brought to the notice of this Court.

¶14

Since we had not decided the writ petition on merits and had issued the direction to release the amount on the basis of the order dated 07.10.2017, which appears to have been stayed by the modified order dated 16.10.2017, the prayer made in this application is granted. The order of which the review is sought is recalled. The miscellaneous civil application is allowed and disposed of.

¶15

MCA397-18

¶16

¶17

The writ petition may be listed for admission and hearing before the appropriate Bench as per its turn.

¶18

JUDGE JUDGE

¶19

APTE

The State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary Women and Child Development Dept. Mumbai and Other v. Lokkalyan Bahuudeshiya Shikshan Sanstan, Thr. Secretary, Mr. Purshotam Jagannath Choudhary and 1

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary Women and Child Development Dept. Mumbai and Other v. Lokkalyan Bahuudeshiya Shikshan Sanstan, Thr. Secretary, Mr. Purshotam Jagannath Choudhary and 1

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. Babita Vasanta Ramteke @ Sau. Babita Nagsen Kadbe and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Its. Secretary, Electricity Dept. Mantralaya Mumbai and Others

Nitesh S/O Vinod Khandelwal Vs Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Urban Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Amravati Thr. Authorized Officer Amravati and Anothe

Swarup S/O Suresh Rahangadale Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, School Education Department, Mumbai and Others