Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order holding an appeal treated as disposed due to failure to furnish appeal compilation within prescribed time.
What did the court decide?
The appeal shall be treated as disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
lpa-22824.94.doc
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.22824 OF 1994
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Kiran Dhavle i/b. Mr. R.S. Apte, Senior Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Vinayak Kumbhar i/b. Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 24th OCTOBER 2018. P.C. :
1 Perused the order dated 17th September 2018. In terms of this order the appellant has not furnished compilation of appeal to enable the Registry to reconstruct the file. Notice in terms of order dated 17th September 2018 be published on the website of this Court.
2 If the appeal is not already disposed of, the same shall be treated as disposed of. We make it clear that if the appeal is already disposed of, the order of disposing of the appeal will remain unaffected. Pending civil application, if any, is disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
A.S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court