Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The bench observed that the Registry failed to supply the appeal compilation required to reconstruct files. Consequently, the unvalenced Letters Patent Appeal was stood disposed of as a nullity.
What did the court decide?
Letters Patent Appeal treated as disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
lpast-11164.94.doc
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.11164 OF 1994
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
None for the Appellant.
PallaviMahendraWargaonkar Digitallysigned byPallaviMahendraWargaonkarDate:2018.10.1116:13:58+0530
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 9th OCTOBER 2018. P.C. :
1 Perused the order dated 5th September 2018. Registry has reported that notice in terms of the said order has been published on the website of this Court. However, copy of appeal compilation has not been supplied to enable the Registry to reconstruct the files of the Letters Patent Appeal.
2 If the appeal is not already disposed of, the same shall be treated as disposed of. We make it clear that if the appeal is already disposed of, the said order will remain unaffected.
Coram
A.S. OKA
M.S. SONAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors. Vs Smt. Margaret Damodar Simon
Swarup Group of Industries a Proprietary Firm through Sole Proprietor Guruswarup Sriwastav Vs Movies N More India Pvt. Ltd.
Raviraj Takawane Vs Skk Steel Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
Anand Y. Pawar and 78 Ors. Vs the State of Maharastra and 4 Ors.