This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.34/2003
IN
F.A. NO. 132/1988
(Mohammad Abdul Akattar s/o Abdul Karim and others vs. State of Maharashtra )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Nobody for appellants
Mrs.A.R.Kulkarni, AGP for respondent-State
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 8th February, 2018.
2 . In view of the specific bar under Section 100A of the Civil Procedure Code, the instant LPA against the order of learned single Judge is not maintainable, as held in LPA No.419/2010 in First Appeal No. 60/1992 delivered by the same Bench, on 01.02.2018.
3 . Hence, we are not required to delve into the merits of the LPA. The same is disposed of. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
sahare
Mohammad Abdul Akattar and others
State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
SWAPNA JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court