The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of Letters Patent Appeal No.191 of 2009 and alongwith Civil Application No.227 of 2009 in terms of consent terms tendered by both parties signified by their representatives.
The appeal and the alongwith civil application are disposed of in terms of consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(902)LPA-191.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.191 OF 2009
ALONGWITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.227 OF 2009
| Pushpalata D. Borude Vs. |
… Appellant |
|---|---|
| Pan India Paryatan Limited | … Respondent |
Mr.Avinash Jalisatgi alongwith Ms.Amita Manjalkar i/by Mr.B.J. Sawant for the Appellant and Applicant.
Mr.Vijay Vaidya and Mr.Durgaprasad Poojari i/by PDS Legal for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & M.S.SONAK, JJ.
DATE : 5th SEPTEMBER, 2018
P.C.
Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “C 1" for identification. The appellant is personally present in the Court. The representative of the respondent is personally present in the Court. Both, the Appellant and the said representative of the Respondent as well as their respective Advocates have signed the Consent Terms.
Accordingly, the Appeal is disposed in terms of the Consent Terms.
1 of 2
rkmore
(902)LPA-191.odt
3 As the Appeal is disposed of, the Civil Application does not survive and is disposed of.
(M.S.SONAK, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
2 of 2
rkmore
Pushpalata D. Borude
Pan India Paryatan Limited
A.S. OKA
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
