Thankiah Jeyaraj v. Indira Jeyaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
A judges order in a testamentary petition signed separately by G.S. Patel. The order text is a one-line adjournment-like direction without substantive reasoning or facts.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGES ORDER (TESTAMENTARY) NO. 68 OF 2017
In
TESTAMENTARY PETITION 1934 OF 2016
Thankiah Jeyaraj ....Petitioner V/S
Indira Jeyaraj ....Respondent
Adv Sumedh H Jagtap For Petitioner
CORAM : G.S. PATEL, J DATE : 8th February, 2018 P.C. :
Judges order signed separately.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thankiah Jeyaraj
- respondent
Indira Jeyaraj
Coram
G.S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sampronius Francis D'Souza and Anr. Vs Lalitambika Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
Bal Asha Trust Vs Manuel Ruiz Martinez Canavate,Spanish and Anr. (Proposed Adopters)
St. Catherines Home Vs Ashwini Kumar Rai and Richa Rai - Adoptive Parents and Kashika Rai- Minor
Pakona Engineers (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shrifal Xtending Engineering and 4 Ors.