Daksha Kishore Surati v. Kinjal Kishore Surati
Case brief
What is this about?
Judges order signed separately in the Testamentary Petition 1007 of 2009, with no detailed reasoning provided in the excerpt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGES ORDER (TESTAMENTARY) NO. 135 OF 2018
In
TESTAMENTARY PETITION 1007 OF 2009
Daksha Kishore Surati ....Petitioner V/S
Kinjal Kishore Surati ....Respondent
S. U. Lakdawala For Petitioner
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 10th December, 2018
P.C. :
Judges order signed separately.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 1/1
Daksha Kishore Surati
Kinjal Kishore Surati
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court