Sunita Santosh Rithe v. Santosh Kishanrao Rithe
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was disposed of as the parties settled the matter outside the court and the appellant expressed lack of interest in further prosecuting the appeal.
The appeal was disposed of as the parties settled the matter outside the court and the appellant expressed lack of interest in further prosecuting the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2017 WITH CA/13390/2017 IN FCA/44/2017
Sunita Santosh Rithe.
...Appellant.
versus
Santosh Kishanrao Rithe.
...Respondent.
Mr.M.R.Andhale, Advocate, for appellant. Mr.Rahul R.Mote, Advocate, for respondent.
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: February 5th, 2018
P.C. :-
agp/
Sunita Santosh Rithe
Santosh Kishanrao Rithe
Sunil P. Deshmukh
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court