The judgment holds that the appeal abated and was disposed of with no order as to costs because the sole appellant was deceased and no legal representatives were brought on record.
The appeal was abated and disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
FIRST APPEAL NO. 94 OF 2009
MICHAEL DIAS SAPECO
Versus
VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF ST. CRUZ THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 8 ORS.,
... Respondents
Adv. S. Bhobe, Advocate for the Appellant. Ms. A. Razaq for Respondent no.1,2,3 & 4. Adv. S. Raikar for Respondent no.2.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:17th July 2018
P.C:
The learned counsel for the appellant informs that the sole appellant is dead. The learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, states that the legal representatives of the appellant do not intend to prosecute the appeal. In any event, as the legal representatives of the sole deceased appellant are not brought on record, the appeal finally abates and is disposed off, as such, with no order as to costs.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
ap/-
Michael Dias Sapeco
Village Panchayat of St. Cruz
C. V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
