Allowed

The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal v. Sitaram S/O. Domaji Brahmhnkar and Others

Bombay HC28 Aug 2018FA/858/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed an application to withdraw a first appeal which had been settled in a Lok Adalat. Consequently, the deposited compensation amount with interest was ordered to be refunded to the appellant.

What did the court decide?

Permit withdrawal of the appeal and allowance of the application to withdraw the deposited compensation amount with interest.

The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal Vs Sitaram S/O. Domaji Brahmhnkar and Others — Bombay HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

caf2479.18 26

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.2479/2018 IN FA NO.858/2016 The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Yavatmal, Taluka and District Yavatmal

¶5

..vs..

¶6

Sitaram Domaji Brahamankar and ors

¶7

Sitaram Domaji Brahamankar : Applicant/Respondent No.1

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

¶9

appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders

¶10

None for applicant/respondent No.1.

¶11

Shri P.B. Patil, Counsel for the appellant.

¶12

Shri I.J. Damle, AGP for non-applicant Nos.2 and 3.

¶13

CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : AUGUST 28, 2018.

¶14

This is an application for withdrawal of the amount deposited

¶15

by the appellant.

¶16

The present appeal was placed before the National Lok Adalat held on 9.12.2017 at Yavatmal. In the said Lok Adalat, the parties to the appeal have amicably settled the dispute. In pursuance to the said settlement, learned counsel Shri P.B. Patil for the appellant submits that the appellant has deposited the amount before this Court.

¶17

In view of the settlement of the dispute before the Lok Adalat, learned counsel Shri P.B. Patil for the appellant submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present appeal.

¶18

Learned counsel Shri P.B. Patil for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present appeal.

¶19

Since the appeal is withdrawn, in view of the compromise and the amount is deposited by the appellant before this Court, the present application for withdrawal of the compensation amount as deposited by the appellant is allowed.

¶20

Applicant/respondent No.1/claimant will be entitled to withdraw

.....2/-

caf2479.18 26

the amount so deposited along with interest accrued thereon.

¶25

The civil application is allowed and disposed of accordingly and the first appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶26

The appellant will be entitled for refund of the Court Fees, if any, as per law.

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

!! BRW !!

¶29

...../-

The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal v. Sitaram S/O. Domaji Brahmhnkar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal v. Sitaram S/O. Domaji Brahmhnkar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Radhika W/O Rajesh @ Abhay Undal Vs Shri Rajesh @ Abhay S/O Shyamrao S/O Kundlikrao Undal and Another

V.I.D.C. Thr. Exe. Engineer, Bembla Project Dn. Yavatmal Vs Santosh Waman Thakre and Oths

Khandu G. Kakade Vs the Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd., Chandrapur, Thr. Branch Geetesh Auto. and Ot

Ex. Engineer Minor Irrigation Division, Pusad, Yavatmal Vs Govinda Ratnu Jadhav and Others

Hiraman S/O Bhika Jadhao Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector, Yavatmal and 2 Others

Hiraman S/O Bhika Jadhao Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector, Yavatmal and 2 Others