The single judge listed the first appeal for final hearing on merit, dispensing with the print formality as records were already available.
In an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act, the court held that with the receipt of records and paper book, the formality of print is dispensed with and the appeal is listed for final hearing on merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
21 FIRST APPEAL NO.2759 OF 2010
SHANTARAM ARJUN PATIL AND ANR
VERSUS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQ OFFICER UPPER TAPI PROJECT HATNUR 2 AND ANR
Advocate for Appellants : Mr. A.B. Kale AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.N. Morampalle.
CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.
DATE : 2nd March, 2020.
PER COURT:
R. & P. with paper book has already been received to this court. Therefore, formality of print is hereby dispensed with. List the appeal for fnal hearing on merit in due course.
[K.K. SONAWANE] JUDGE.
Grt/-.
Shantaram Arjun Patil and Anr.
The Special Land Acq Officer Upper Tapi Project Hatnur 2 and Anr.
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
