This judgment in a National Lok Adalat disposed of multiple appeals filed by G.M.I.D.C Aurangabad. The appeals were withdrawn by the appellant based on a recent Full Bench judgment clarifying the award of interest, leading to the order disposing the matter as withdrawn.
All appeals are disposed of as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
966-984
-1-
IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANGESH S. PATIL, HELD ON 08.12.2018,
AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD
966 FIRST APPEAL NO.2228 OF 2009
WITH CAST/9936/2009 IN FA/2228/2009 GODAWARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AURANGABAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR
AND
967 FIRST APPEAL NO.2460 OF 2009
WITH FA/2454/2009 WITH FA/2455/2009 WITH FA/2456/2009 WITH FA/2457/2009 WITH FA/2458/2009 WITH FA/2459/2009
WITH FA/2461/2009
GODAWARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AURANGABAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR
AND
968 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13523 OF 2009
IN FAST/21071/2009
G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
969 FIRST APPEAL NO.813 OF 2010
WITH CA/13531/2009 IN FA/813/2010
G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR
AND
970 FIRST APPEAL NO.814 OF 2010
WITH CA/13533/2009 IN FA/814/2010
G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
966-984
-2-
AND
971 FIRST APPEAL NO.819 OF 2010
WITH CA/13547/2009 IN FA/819/2010 G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
972 FIRST APPEAL NO.820 OF 2010
WITH CA/13543/2009 IN FA/820/2010 G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
973 FIRST APPEAL NO.821 OF 2010
WITH CA/13536/2009 IN FA/821/2010 G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
974 FIRST APPEAL NO.822 OF 2010
WITH CA/13559/2009 IN FA/822/2010
G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
975 FIRST APPEAL NO.823 OF 2010
WITH CA/13551/2009 IN FA/823/2010
G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
976 FIRST APPEAL NO.824 OF 2010
WITH CA/13545/2009 IN FA/824/2010
G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
966-984
-3-
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
977 FIRST APPEAL NO.825 OF 2010
WITH CA/13522/2009 IN FA/825/2010 G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STAE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
978 FIRST APPEAL NO.827 OF 2010
WITH CA/13540/2009 IN FA/827/2010 G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
979 FIRST APPEAL NO.1643 OF 2010
WITH CA/13556/2009 IN FA/1643/2010 G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
980 FIRST APPEAL NO.1644 OF 2010
G.M.I.D.C AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS EXE ENGINEER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
AND
981 FIRST APPEAL NO.247 OF 2011
WITH CA/2280/2011 IN FA/247/2011 WITH CA/14154/2011 IN
FA/247/2011
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NANDUR MADHMESHWAR CANAL
DIVISION
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
AND
966-984
-4-
982 FIRST APPEAL NO.248 OF 2011
WITH CA/2279/2011 IN FA/248/2011 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NANDUR MADHMESHWAR CANAL
DIVISION
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
AND
983 FIRST APPEAL NO.249 OF 2011
WITH CA/2277/2011 IN FA/249/2011
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NANDUR MADHMESHWAR CANAL
DIVISION
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
AND
984 FIRST APPEAL NO.3553 OF 2011
WITH CA/1907/2011 IN FA/3553/2011 WITH CA/1908/2011 IN
FA/3553/2011
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NANDUR MADHMESHWAR CANAL DIVISION
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Mr. B.R.Surwase, Advocate for Appellant Mr. A.R.Kale, AGP for Respondent/s-State Mr. P.B.Shirsath, Advocate for Respondent No.2
Mr. Buwasaheb Dnyanoba Bade, Sub Divisional Officer, IPS, Sub Division No.6, Vaijapur.
O R D E R
03.11.2016 and the Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and
966-984
-5-
13.08.2018 and therefore the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeals since the question of interest is covered by the Full Bench
in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs. Kailash Shiva
Rangari ; 2016 (4) ALL MR 513 (F.B.) .
(K.B. Choudhari) (A.T.A.K. Shaikh) (Mangesh S. Patil, J.) Advocate D.J.(Retd.) Head of the Panel Member Member
Date: 08.12.2018 Place: Aurangabad
vmk/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Maharashtra Vs. Kailash Shiva RangariReferred¶129
State of Maharashtra Vs. Kailash Shiva Rangari ; 2016 (4) ALL MR 513 (F.B.)
G.M.I.D.C Aurangabad
The State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
