Disposed
Harishchandra Mahadeo Patil v. Anant Krishna Patil and Others
Bombay HCFA/1003/1997
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.FA1003_1997.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL No. 1003 OF 1997 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6627 OF 1997 IN F.A. No. 1003 OF 1997 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5807 OF 1999 IN F.A. No. 1003 OF 1997
Harishchandra Mahadeo Patil
... Appellant/Applicant
Vs.
Anant Krishna Patil & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. S.G. Kudle, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Pradeep M. Patil a/w. Mr. Pravin Gole, Advocate for respondent no.1.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: 6th February, 2018.
P.C.:
By the order dated 30th January, 2018, this Court has
transferred this Appeal along with Civil Applications to the District Court, Alibag, Raigad on the ground that the suit is valued below one crore. However, registry has pointed out that the Appeal is under Land Acquisition Act. This is the First Appeal and under statute, it is to be filed before the High Court. Hence, the order dated 30th January, 2018 of transferring the Appeal is hereby recalled. The First Appeal along with Civil Applications are taken on board.
1 / 2
15.FA1003_1997.doc
learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submitted that appellantHarishchandra Mahadeo Patil expired 5 years back.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 / 2
Harishchandra Mahadeo Patil
Anant Krishna Patil
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court