This Criminal Misc. Application was disposed of as it did not survive the disposal of the principal Criminal Writ Petition No.79 of 2018. It involves no legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mukund 1 crma-114.18 dt. 23 -10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.114 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 79 OF 2018
Sandesh G.Shigaonkar…Petitioner
Versus
State Through the Police Inspector,
Panaji and others.….Respondents
Mr. T. George John, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pravin N. Faldessai, Additional Government Advocate for
Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
Mr. V.Naik, Advocate for Respondent no.3.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.
Date : 23 October 2018.
P.C. :
In view of disposal of Criminal Writ Petition No.79 of
2018, this application does not survive and disposed of.
Prithviraj K. Chavan, J. N.M. Jamdar, J.
Sandesh G.Shigaonkar
State Through the Police Inspector, Panaji
N.M. Jamdar
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court