Disposed
Shamrao Nandu Sapkale v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCCP/924/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.924 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5478 OF 2008
Shamrao Nandu Sapkale
… Versus …
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Mr. M.R. Wagh, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.M. Ganachari, AGP for the respondents/State
CORAM : P.B. VARALE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI,JJ.
DATE : 21st DECEMBER, 2018
PER COURT :
1 After arguing some time the learned counsel prayed for
withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file other remedies under Law, if
so advised. Petition is allowed to withdraw with liberty as prayed.
( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( P.B. Varale ) JUDGE JUDGE
agd
Shamrao Nandu Sapkale
The State of Maharashtra
P.B. Varale
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court