Petitioner withdrew the contempt and writ petition filed in this High Court. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
609.18cp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 609 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.12282 OF 2017
Rajendra Venkatrao Mendhe
Age: 53 years, Occ: Service,
R/o. Bevnal, Ta. Shirur-Anantpal,
District Latur.
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
1.A.P. Shejale
Age: Major, Occ: Service as
Deputy Director (R) of the
Scheduled Tribe Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad.
2.S.A. Atale,
Age: Major, Occ: Service as
Sub Divisional Officer/
Magistrate, Latur, Dist. Latur...RESPONDENTS
Mr A.V. Indrale Patil, Advocate h/f Mr A.N.
Gaddime, Advocate for petitioner;
Mr C.S. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,JJ.
DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2018
ORAL ORDER :
Heard learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioner some time. Learned Counsel appearing
609.18cp (2)
for the petitioner, on instructions, prays for
withdrawal of the petition.
2.In view of submission of learned Counsel
appearing for the petitioner, the petition is
allowed to be withdrawn.
3.The petition is disposed of, as withdrawn.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE)(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGEJUDGE
Tupe
Rajendra Venkatrao Mendhe
A.P. Shejale
S.A. Atale
Prashanna B. Varale
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court