The Court disposed of contempt petition no.59/2018 filed by petitioner against respondents, allowing it as the trial shows some delay but no malafides.
Contempt petition disposed of with no malafides observed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.59/2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4218/2016
(Sharda Yatayat Evam Parvahan Sahakari Samiti vs. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra and another )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.U. Ambagade, Adv. for petitioner
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 23rd February, 2018.
JUDGE JUDGE
sahare
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the contempt petition regarding compliance with directions issued by this Court.
Whether any malafides exist given the delay in compliance.
Sharda Yatayat Evam Parvahan Sahakari Samiti
Rajiv Ranjan Mishra
another
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
SWAPNA JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
