In a contempt petition under WP/10177/2012, the petitioner submitted that the order alleged to be disobeyed has been complied with subsequently, praying for the disposal of the petition. The court disposed of the matter on these submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
cp552.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONT. PETITION NO. 552 OF 2015
IN WP/10177/2012
M/S SPECTRUM INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGH ITS PARTNER AMOL SHRIPAD
GHULE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.S.P. Brahme, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs.V.S. Choudhari, AGP for respondent/State.
CORAM : S.S.SHINDE &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :03.04.2018
P.C. :-
1.Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on
instructions, submits that subsequent to filing of this
Contempt Petition, the order of which disobedience is
alleged, has been complied by the respondents. In that
view of the matter, the Contempt Petition stands disposed
of.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.]
[S.S.SHINDE,J.]
snk/2018/APR18/ cp552.15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Petition should be disposed of on the allegation that the order of disobedience has been complied with.
M/S Spectrum Infrastructure Through Its Partner Amol Shripad Ghule
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court