Single-line order dismissing a company petition by the respondent's counsel for failure to serve the petitioner with the rejoinder despite directed timelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.CP48.16.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.48 OF 2016
M/s.Sitarganj Fibres Limited )….Petitioner
V/s. M/s.Birla Cotsyn (India) Limited )....Respondent
None for petitioner. Ms.Chaitrika Patki i/by Vidhi Partners for respondent.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 9.7.2018
P.C.:-
been served copy of the rejoinder by petitioner though the court directed on 25.6.2018 to file rejoinder by 29.6.2018 and further extended the time to file rejoinder upto 6.7.2018 by an order dated 2.7.2018. Therefore, petition dismissed.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
KJ
M/s. Sitarganj Fibres Limited
M/s. Birla Cotsyn (India) Limited
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
