Petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance of a direction regarding school re-recognition. The State Government subsequently granted permission, purging the contempt and disposing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Sr910CP467.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 467 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 14591 OF 2017
Uttam Mariba Sonkamble Petitioner...
Versus
Dr. Vandana Krishna, Principal Secretary, School Education Department & Anr.
Respondent...
Mr A. N. Sabnis, Advocate for the petitioner Mr S. Y. Mahajan, AGP for respondent/State.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATE : 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2018.
PER COURT:-
May-2018, the respondent failed to take appropriate steps in view of
the directions issued by this Court. The Division Bench of this Court was pleased to issue simple notice to respondent no. 1 only on 05.07.2018.
2 Sr910CP467.2018
[ MANISH PITALE ] [ PRASANNA B. VARALE ] JUDGE JUDGE
Punde
Uttam Mariba Sonkamble
Dr. Vandana Krishna
Prasanna B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
