The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Contempt Petition No.44 of 2018 accepting the State's statement regarding pending vigilance proceedings. No costs were awarded.
Contempt Petition disposed of. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.44 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7354 OF 2015
Dhanshri Balasaheb Kashid ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents.
Mr.P.V.Jadhavar, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.S.Shinde, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND A.M. DHAVALE,JJ.
Date : 29.01.2018.
PER COURT :
instructions states that the vigilance is also conducted and validation proceedings would be decided within three (3) months. The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on 12.2.2018.
2
(A.M.DHAVALE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
asp/office/Cp44.18
3
Dhanshri Balasaheb Kashid
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
A.M. Dhavale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
