Contempt petition stands disposed of as the application for premature release was already decided pursuant to directions issued by the court. No further orders were necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp383.18
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
931 CONT. PETITION NO. 383 OF 2018
IN CRI. WP/198/2018
KISAN SOMA RATHOD (C-8098) CENTRAL PRISON, AURANGABAD VERSUS
BAPURAO RAMRAO MORE, SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Jaiswal Rupesh AGP for Respondents: Mr. D.R. Kale
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE AND
DATED : 13th JUNE, 2018
PER COURT :-
It is not in dispute that pursuant to the directions issued by this court, the application of the petitioner for premature release has been decided. In that view of the matter, we do not think it necessary to pass any further orders in this contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
rlj/
KISAN SOMA RATHOD
BAPURAO RAMRAO MORE
S. S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
