Dismissed
Vijaysingh Krishnarao Parbat v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCCP/231/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 26_cp_231_2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.231 OF 2016
Vijaysingh Krishnarao Parbat …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. A.A. Desai for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent -State. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Dilip Bodake for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 18th JUNE, 2018.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties. The Petitioner has filed this contempt petition alleging breach of order dated 9th July, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.6098 of 2012. By the said order the Respondent No.2- Kurduwadi Nagar Parishad was directed to consider the Petitioner's application dated 7th May, 2011 and to decide whether the Respondent No.3-Sadanand More, has carried out illegal construction without obtaining appropriate permission. It was further directed that if it was found that illegal construction has been carried out, the Respondent No.2- Nagar Parishad shall initiate action in accordance
Megha
1/2
Megha 26_cp_231_2016.doc
with law only after following principle of natural justice.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Megha
2/2
Vijaysingh Krishnarao Parbat
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja PrabhuDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court