The High Court of Bombay dismissed a company petition as withdrawn. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition after depositing the entire amount under consent terms entered by both parties.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
16.cp.22.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 22 OF 2017
Sanjay Darooka
Prop. Of M/s. Bidar Chemo Traders
Prop. Of M/s. Bidar Chemo Traders .. Petitioner Vs. BG Petro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.I.Z. Merchant for petitioner.
Mr.V.G. Talreja I/b Gobindram D. Talreja for respondent.
Ms.Jyoti Ghone, Director of respondent present.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 4TH JULY 2018
P.C.
Parties have entered into consent terms. The consent terms dated
29th June 2018, signed by petitioner, director of respondent company who Mr.Talreja states is present in Court and identifies her and their respective advocates is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
Order in terms of the consent terms.
Mr.Merchant states that the entire amount of Rs.6 lakhs has been
paid and therefore seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Since the petition is at pre-admission stage, petition dismissed as withdrawn.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1/1
Shraddha Talekar PS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the company petition should be allowed to be withdrawn at the pre-admission stage.
Sanjay Darooka
BG Petro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
KR Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
