Contempt petition disposed by High Court of Bombay Nagpur Bench upon submission that directions were complied with. Notice discharged. No costs.
Notice issued to the respondents is discharged. Contempt petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp01.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 01/2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6285/2016
Vijay S/o Tulshiram Jadhav
..VS..
Sudhirchand Shekhar Panchabhai
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri C.V. Jagdale, Advocate for the petitioner Shri V.G. Wankhede, Advocate for the respondent
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND
Z.A.HAQ, JJ. DATED : 19/06/2018
1] Heard.
2] The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent submit that directions of which breach is complained have been complied with. The learned advocate for the petitioner states that in view of the compliance, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the contempt petition further. There are no allegations of any malafide. We also see no reason to continue with the prosecution of the contempt petition.
3] The contempt petition is disposed. Notice issued to the respondents is discharged. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Ansari
Vijay S/o Tulshiram Jadhav
Sudhirchand Shekhar Panchabhai
B. P. Dharmadhikari
Z. A. Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
