Contempt petition against respondents in PIL No. 161 of 2015 disposed of. Court relied on affidavit-in-reply stating police took action on petitioner's complaints regarding sound pollution.
None. Contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
7-cp-123-17.doc
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 123 OF 2017
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 161 OF 2015
Dr. Taramati S. Pathak Vs. 1. Shri S. Babar and ors.
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Ms. Sucheta Ghasias for petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for respondent nos.3 and 4.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL, ACTING CJ. & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
OCTOBER 03, 2018.
P.C.
1. The learned AGP referred to the affidavit-in-reply dated
3/9/2018 filed by Shri Ashok Anandrao Kadam, Police Inspector, Swargate
Police Station, Pune. Paras 3, 4 and 5 of the said affidavit-in-reply read as
under:-
“3. I hereby submit that, Swargate Police Station did not give permission to any kind of Mandals for allowing loud speakers for celebration of Aannabhau Sathe Jayanti. (01/08/2018) Also, we follow all guidelines and orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court with regards to sound pollution.
2
7-cp-123-17.doc
filed by Shri Ashok Anandrao Kadam, Police Inspector, Swargate Police
Station, Pune, Contempt Petition is disposed of.
G. S. KULKARNI J. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Digitally signed by Pravin Pravin Dasharath Dasharath Pandit Pandit Date: 2018.10.04 15:47:22 +0530
Dr. Taramati S. Pathak
Shri S. Babar
NARESH H. PATIL
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
