Contempt petition No. 0101 of 2018 was allowed to be withdrawn by order of the court.
Permission granted to withdraw the contempt petition; the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Contempt Petition No. 0101 of 2018 (In Criminal Writ Petition No. 01509 of 2017)
District : Beed
Afsarunnisa Begum w/o. Shaikh Nizam... Petitioner.
versus
Sreedhar Govindrajan,
Superintendent of Police, Beed,
Office of Superintendent of Police,
Barshi Road, Beed, Dist. Beed. .. Respondent.
...........
Mr. Sayyed Tauseef Yaseen, Advocate, for the petitioner.
...........
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.
DATE : 08TH MARCH 2018
ORAL ORDER :
01.Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the contempt petition.
02.Permission, as sought for, granted. The
contempt petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( Prasanna B. Varale )
JUDGE JUDGE
...........
puranik / CP101.18
Afsarunnisa Begum w/o. Shaikh Nizam
Sreedhar Govindrajan
Prasanna B. Varale
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court