The Bombay High Court allowed a chamber summons seeking permission to amend the writ petition before admission, permitting the inclusion of a specific letter on record.
Chamber summons allowed; petitioner permitted to amend petition and bring on record a letter dated 20th January 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
CHAMBER SUMMONS No. 274 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1998 OF 2017
Shailesh Ramashray Upadhyay. ..Applicant. In the matter between Shailesh Ramashray Upadhyay. ..Petitioner. Versus Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Others. ..Respondents.
Mr. A. R. Mishra for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. Hemant Haryan, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. R. R. Lanjekar for Respondent No. 4. Mr. H. C. Pimple for MCGM.
Coram : Ranjit More & A. M. Badar, JJ. Date : April 26, 2018.
P. C. :
1 / 2
patilsr
Petitioner is also permitted to bring on record the letter dated 20th January 2018 by the Executive Engineer (DP) H&K, MCGM addressed to the Executive Engineer (IV), SRA. Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. The Petitioner shall thereafter serve copy of the amended petition on all concerned. Let the petition come up on board for admission as per the CMIS date.
[A. M. BADAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
2 / 2
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission is granted to amend the writ petition due to subsequent events.
Shailesh Ramashray Upadhyay
Slum Rehabilitation Authority
MCGM
Ranjit More
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
