Disposed
Narendra Jamnadas Khilnani and Anr. v. Razia Raza Ansari and Riyaz Lakhani and 2 Ors. (Respondent)
Bombay HCCHS/106/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-chs106-16.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.106 OF 2016
IN
SUIT NO.20 OF 2016
Narendra J. Khilnani & Anr. ...Applicants IN THE MATTER OF : Narendra J. Khilnani & Anr. ...Plaintiffs V/s. Raziz Raza Ansari ...Defendant And Riyaz Lakhani & Ors. ...Respondents
Ms.Neeta Solanki I/b Kiran Jain & Co. for the Applicants / Plaintiffs. Mr.Ansari with Mr.Arif Siddiqui for the Defendant No.1.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2018.
P.C. :-
the plaint and to bring the subsequent events on record transpired
1/2
10-chs106-16.doc
during the pendency of the suit and to implead the respondents as the defendant nos.2 to 4, who are the alleged transferees of the part of the suit property. In my view, the respondents are necessary parties to the suit.
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
2/2
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court