The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn by the appellant Commissioner of Central Excise, acting under tribunal instructions for tax effects under Rs. 50 lakhs.
Withdrawal of appeal allowed; case treated as dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-CEXA-310-16.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 310 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Central Excise …Appellant
Versus
M/s. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. …Respondent
Mr. Swapnil Bangur, a/w Ms. Indrayani Deshmukh, for the Appellant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 19 October 2018
ORDER :
1944 challenges the order dated 30th November 2015 passed by
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
1 / 2
October 19, 2018
906-CEXA-310-16.doc
issued by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs directs the Revenue not to file fresh Appeals and also withdraw the pending Appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50.00 Lakhs.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 / 2 October 19, 2018
The Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
