This court disposed of an appeal involving revenue under Rs. Twenty Lakhs by applying the Revenue's circular, keeping the questions open for an appropriate case under Central Excise jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
30-CEXA-19.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.19 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Appellant Vs. M/s. Reliance Communication Ltd. .... Respondent
Ms P.S. Cardozo for the Appellant. Mr. Jitendra Motwani with Ms Ginita Badani i/by Economic Laws Practice for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : APRIL 16, 2018
P.C:
Ms Cardozo fairly states that the Revenue's circular under which appeals involving revenue of less than Rupees Twenty Lakhs should not be pursued in the High Court would disable her from proceeding with this appeal. In the circumstances, applying that Revenue's circular alone this appeal is disposed of. The questions are kept open for being decided in an appropriate case.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate
M/s. Reliance Communication Ltd.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
