The High Court dismissed the Central Excise Appeal of 2016 as withdrawn by the appellant counsel due to a Circular limiting appeals below Rs. 50 Lakhs tax effect.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-CEXA-142-16.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Central Excise, …Appellant Customs and Service Tax
Versus
M/s. Gold Jyoti Polymer
…Respondents
Mr. Sham Walve, i/by Mr. Nikhil Wadikar, for the Appellant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 8 October 2018
ORDER :
SharayuPandurangKhot Digitally signedby SharayuPandurang KhotDate: 2018.10.1111:47:44 +1200
1944 challenges the order dated 12th May 2015 passed by
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
1 / 2
October 8, 2018
43-CEXA-142-16.doc
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 / 2
October 8, 2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s. Gold Jyoti Polymer
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
