One application disposed on withdrawal by leave of the court. Another interim application for early hearing in a promotion matter was disposed of without granting fixed date or costs, with liberty to apply after the proposed promotion committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 caw740.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.W. NO.740/2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.7111/2014 Dilip S/o Hanumanji Kalaskar
..Vs..
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), Mumbai and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri H.N. Verma, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri R.B. Puranik, Advocate for respondent No.4.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ.
DATED : 12.6.2018.
C.A.W. NO.741/2018 .
JUDGE JUDGE
Tambaskar .
Dilip S/o Hanumanji Kalaskar
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), Mumbai and others
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
Z.A.HAQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
