Partly allowed

Shri. Sayyed Bashir Sayyed Abdul v. State of Maharashtra, Revenue Department, through Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC16 Jul 2018CAW/702/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed condonation of delay for filing Civil Appeals by legal representatives of a deceased petitioner in a land acquisition matter. Abatement set aside and applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Delay condensed, abatement set aside, legal representatives permitted on record, applications disposed of, amendment ordered within two weeks.

Shri. Sayyed Bashir Sayyed Abdul Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

1 wp6071.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 702 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 703 OF 2018

¶4

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 704 OF 2018 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 6071 OF 2016

¶6

(SAYYED BASHIR SAYYED ABDUL...VS..STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & 3 OTH.)

¶7

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

- - - - None for the applicants. Shri D.P. Thakre, Addl. G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

¶9

CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ.

¶10

DATED : JULY 16, 2018.

¶11

Nobody for the applicants. We have heard the learned A.G.P. for the respondent/State.

¶12

The dispute is about acquisition of immovable property. The petitioner has expired and there is delay of about 283 days in his legal representatives moving these applications.

¶13

Though the learned A.G.P. is strongly opposing the request and seeking time to verify the facts.

¶14

As we do not see malafides and the applications are filed in March, 2018, we grant the same. Accordingly, delay in filing the application and in bringing legal representatives on record is condoned. Abatement is set aside.

¶15

2 wp6071.16

¶16

The applicants are permitted to come on record as legal representatives of the petitioner. All the applications stand disposed of accordingly. Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks.

¶17

(Z.A.Haq, J) (B.P.Dharmadhikari,J)

¶18

RRaut..

Shri. Sayyed Bashir Sayyed Abdul v. State of Maharashtra, Revenue Department, through Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Sayyed Bashir Sayyed Abdul v. State of Maharashtra, Revenue Department, through Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra S/O Sudhakar Nimje Vs Shri Vinod Patil, Vice President, the Schedule Tirbe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Dr. Ambedkar Sahakari Gruha Nirman Sanstha Maryadit, Nagpur through Its President Premdas Tambe Vs State of Maharashtra, through Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nagpur

Dilip Amrut Gawai Vs Union Bank of India Thr. Its General Manager (Personnel)

Smt. Laxmibai Vithobaji Harde and 2 Others Vs State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Revenue Department (Land Acquisition), Mumbai and 2 Ot

Ashok Bhaurao Pagote and Others Vs Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi and Others

Ms. Sachi D/O Ganesh Chute Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Mumbai and Ors.