The High Court disposed of the Civil Application as infructuous because the applicant failed to deposit the required security amount and the Commissioner refused to proceed with the revision hearing.
Civil Application No.638 of 2018 is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-caw-638-2018.odt
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.638 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1364 OF 2018 Damodar Shanmugam Mudaliar ] Applicant/Petitioner IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Damodar Shanmugam Mudaliar ] Petitioner Vs. Haresh Manilal Patel and others. ] Respondents
Mr. P.C. Kansara i/b Kansara & Thanekar, for Applicant. Ms. Fatima Barodawalla i/b Raval Shah, for Respondent No.1
CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2018.
P.C.
Heard Mr. Kansara, learned Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Barodawalla, learned Counsel for respondent No.1.
1 of 2
3-caw-638-2018.odt
[R.G. KETKAR, J.]
2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Damodar Shanmugam Mudaliar
Haresh Manilal Patel
R.G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
