The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed a Civil Application to correct a specific factual mis-statement in the impugned order dated 24/01/2018 regarding the sanction and handover of a layout plan.
The prayer to correct the factual error in the order dated 24/01/2018 was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw488.18-Orde r
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLN. (W) NO. 488 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETN. NO. 5494 OF 2017 (D)
Ramesh Babarao Kale and others
-vs-
The Collector, Yavatmal and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr.P.P.Deshmukh, counsel for the applicant/respondent No.2. Mr. Vinay Dahat, counsel for the petitioners.
Mr.A.S.Fulzele, Addl.G.P.for the respondent No.1.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK & MR. A.D.UPADHYE JJ.
DATE : 16.03.2018.
By this civil application, the applicant/respondent No.2 seeks to correct a factual error in the order dated 24/01/2018.
Hence, as per prayer made in the application instead of the words 'the layout plan is not sanctioned', the words 'the layout plan is sanctioned but it is not handed over to the municipal council' should be incorporated in paragraphs-3 and 5 of the order dated 24/01/2018. Since the statement that is sought to be corrected is a factual mis-statement, the prayer is granted. The necessary correction should be carried out at the earliest. The civil application stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Ramesh Babarao Kale
The Collector, Yavatmal
Vasanti A Naik
A.D. Upadhye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
