This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0510caw2422.18
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION [w] NO. 2422/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4190/2018.
Bandu Bhauji Sidam and others
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2018.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Though Shri Paunikar, learned counsel for respondent is opposing the application, as the matter is still not admitted, we allow the same. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week. Liberty to respondents to file additional affidavit, if any, without further period of one week.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Bandu Bhauji Sidam and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
M. G. GIRATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
