The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a civil application moved by respondents 2 and 3 in the underlying writ petition, granting an extension of time and allowing the application.
extended time as prayed for
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
2808caw1991.18
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 1991/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 631/2018.
Vijay Omprakash Chavhan
Director Higher Education Amravati and otehrs.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 28, 2018.
Heard Ms. M.P. Munshi, learned counsel for applicants/respondent nos. 2 and 3, Shri R.V. Shinde, learned counsel for original petitioner, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1 and Shri P.B. Patil, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Vijay Omprakash Chavhan
Director Higher Education Amravati
B.P. Dharmaadhikari
M.G. Giratkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
