Disposed

Rajendra Vasant Todwalkar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Oct 2018CAW/1954/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil applications were disposed of as the applicants were not aggrieved by the impugned order. The Court granted liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal for substantive relief.

What did the court decide?

Granted liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

Rajendra Vasant Todwalkar and Ors. Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2018)

caw1953-1954.doc

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1953 OF 2018,
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1954 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.11725 OF 2018

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.P.G.Sawant, AGP for the Petitioner
Mr.Ranjit A. Agashe for the Respondent No.1
Mr.Pankaj R. Thatte for respondent Nos.2 to 13 and 15
Ms Ketaki A. Asgemkar for applicant in CAW 1953/2018
and CAW/1954/2018

¶9

CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
 M.S.SONAK,JJ.
DATE :OCTOBER 11, 2018

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

.Not on board. Taken on board.
1The learned counsel for the
applicantssubmitsthatthese
applications may be taken up for
hearing. We have perused the
applications.Perusalofthe
applications will show that the
applicants are not aggrieved by the
orders impugned in this petition. It
is not their case that they are
adversely affected by the impugned
order but the contention of the

¶12

2 caw1953-1954.doc

¶13

applicants is that the applicants are
similarly placed as the applicants in
the Original Application before the
Tribunal. If that be so, the applicants
will have to move the Maharashtra
Administrative Tribunal for grant of
appropriate substantive relief. We find
that the relief granted by the impugned
order is confined to the applicants in
the Original Application before the
Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

¶14

2Therefore, by granting liberty to
adopt appropriate proceedings, we
dispose of the Civil Applications.

¶15

(M.S.SONAK,J.)

Rajendra Vasant Todwalkar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Vasant Todwalkar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharati Shashikant Patil Vs Prabhavati Sitaram Mhatre and 11 Ors.

Anand Rathi Commodities Limited Vs Encore Natural Polymers Private Limited

M/S. Mantri Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary and Ors.

Rajesh Sahebrao Shinde Vs Shri Janardan Vasant Patil

M/S. Balaji Builders and Developers Thru Partners Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri. Sanjay Nilkanth Palande and Anr. Vs the Tahasildar, Satara and Ors.